Ofcom will keep an eye out for ‘GB News behaving itself’

The watchdog also explained why it has not fined the broadcaster over Covid claims made on one of its shows.

A director at Ofcom said the watchdog will be looking at GB News to see if the broadcaster is “behaving itself” following the channel breaching its broadcasting code with Covid claims for the second time.

Adam Baxter, director of broadcasting standards at Ofcom, was speaking at the Voice of the Listener & Viewer (VLV) spring conference on Thursday when he was asked about the recent ruling.

Mr Baxter explained why the watchdog did not fine GB News, saying: “I’m not expecting everybody to agree with us on that but our decision in this case was that the second breach has not reached that bar (on fining).

“Now, clearly, we will be seeing if in future GB News behaves itself and we will be looking at any other such investigations and obviously, we look at all the evidence open to (us) in assessing compliance records.”

The UK regulator said it was particularly concerned by guest Dr Naomi Wolf’s “significant and alarming claim” that mass murder was taking place through the rollout of the vaccinations, which she repeated three times.

Ofcom previously said on Tuesday that GB News “fell short” of the requirement to protect audiences from potentially harmful content by “allowing Naomi Wolf to promote a serious conspiracy theory without challenge or context” on an episode of the Mark Steyn show in October.

Mr Baxter also faced criticism from professor of communications at the University of Westminster, Steven Barnett, who said Ofcom “has the power to act” in regulating impartiality on new broadcasters.

He said that the watchdog has been “disingenuous in interpreting the act” in recent rulings.

Mr Barnett added: “Its own code and that would allow it much more flexibility to come down on those kinds of programmes, quite clearly (are)….partisan, one-sided.”

Replying to him, Mr Baxter said: “The audience expectations to GB News… which is a self describing disrupter, focusing in a certain sort of agenda, would not be identical to a (public service broadcaster).

“A lot of these cases, I’m not pretending otherwise are pushing the envelope.”

He added the watchdog has to be “very impartial” and they have to look at whether the broadcasters are the “right side of the line”.

Cabinet Meeting
Jacob Rees-Mogg (right), then culture secretary Nadine Dorries (second right) and Scottish Secretary Alister Jack (third right) in 2022 as then prime minister Boris Johnson (left) chairs a cabinet meeting (Leon Neal/PA)

Mr Baxter also said: “The legislation does not prescribe what issues you shouldn’t be covering…we are existing in the context of our statutory duties, and balancing concepts such as freedom of expression.”

He also said he had to be “quite careful” talking about whether having Conservative MPs presenting programmes was against Ofcom rules due to “investigations”.

Mr Baxter added: “These rules have existed for a long time.

“Indeed, the rule around presenters or politicians presenters….predated Ofcom.”

The watchdog is investigating whether GB News breached impartiality rules by airing an interview between Esther McVey and Philip Davies and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt on March 11 ahead of the spring Budget.

Other MPs present shows including former culture secretary Nadine Dorries hosting a Friday night talk show for TalkTV, while Tory MP for North East Somerset Jacob Rees-Mogg is fronting a regular programme for GB News.

Ms Dorries has said she will stand down as MP for Mid Bedfordshire at the next general election.

Elsewhere former head of political programmes at the BBC, Sue Inglish, said the corporation “should have stuck to its guns” on impartiality after a row with Gary Lineker over his tweets.

The former footballer turned pundit was taken off Match Of The Day after comparing the Government’s language used to promote its asylum proposals to 1930s Germany.

Ms Inglish said that the sports presenter was one of “very few people” at the BBC who are identified with its coverage and under the current guidelines he was “out of order”.

She claimed the corporation was “hamstrung” in dealing with the issue properly as BBC chairman Richard Sharp was not able to properly defend the corporation’s position.

Mr Sharp stepped down from his position after being found to have broken the rules by failing to disclose he played a role in getting then Prime Minister Boris Johnson an £800,000 loan guarantee.

More from Perspective

Get a free copy of our print edition


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Your email address will not be published. The views expressed in the comments below are not those of Perspective. We encourage healthy debate, but racist, misogynistic, homophobic and other types of hateful comments will not be published.