Minister to look at concerns over Sats paper following complaints

Nick Gibb said he does not want the exams which are taken by 10 and 11-year-olds in England to be ‘too hard’.

The schools minister will look at concerns that last week’s Sats exams were too difficult amid claims that a paper left some Year 6 pupils in “tears”.

Nick Gibb said he does not want the exams which are taken by 10 and 11-year-olds in England to be “too hard” as that is “not the purpose” of the assessment.

His comments come after hundreds of parents and teachers complained online that last week’s reading exam was too difficult and a headteachers’ union said some staff also struggled “to understand the questions”.

When asked about parents’ concerns over the difficulty of Sats, Mr Gibb said: “I’ve not seen the paper yet. I’ll look at it next week when it’s available.

“The Standards and Testing Agency have tested this test before in tests before the pandemic, they tested it last year with a large group of children, they monitored the response of those children to the test, to the questions, they found that 85% enjoy taking the test.

“But we will look at this. I will certainly look at this because I know that there has been concern expressed by some schools.”

Sats, or Standard Assessment Tests, are used to measure children’s English and maths skills in Year 2 and Year 6, and consist of six 45-minute papers.

The National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) has expressed concerns over last week’s Sats reading paper and said it plans to raise the issue with exams regulator Ofqual and the Standards and Testing Agency.

Sarah Hannafin, the union’s head of policy, said members had reported that the difficulty of the reading paper “was beyond previous tests”, left children upset, and some staff struggled to understand the questions.

On Friday last week, the Department for Education (DfE) said “the tests are designed to be challenging” to measure attainment across the ability range.

Addressing the fresh concerns about the Sats exams, Mr Gibb told journalists on Monday: “We have psychometricians and practising teachers who put a lot of effort and time into making sure these tests are right for children.

“They do have to test a range of ability to make sure that we can show what proportion of children are exceeding the standard and so on.

“But we don’t want these tests to be too hard for children. That’s not the purpose.

“The purpose is to test the range of ability and the Standards and Testing Agency is charged with making sure that these tests are appropriate for this age group.”

Last week, Kerry Forrester, a headteacher at a Cheshire primary school, expressed concern about the “negative impact” of the Sats exams on the “mental health” of her pupils and she said some were reduced to tears.

James Bowen, assistant general secretary at the NAHT, said: “We are pleased that the Government will be looking at what happened with the reading test this year.

“We have had clear feedback from school leaders that this year’s paper was not pitched appropriately for a large proportion of pupils and even highly proficient readers struggled with it.

“It is essential that test papers are accessible for the large majority of pupils. We need to remember that these are 10 and 11-year-olds and the last thing we need are papers that leave them feeling demotivated and dejected.”

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: “We welcome Nick Gibb’s commitment to look at the concerns raised over the Key Stage 2 reading paper.

“We’ve received a lot of feedback that this paper was unnecessarily difficult and that it left children distressed and teachers very anxious about the impact on their pupils.”

He added: “Key Stage 2 tests are not supposed to be some sort of gruelling rite of passage, but an accountability measure to check on attainment at the end of Key Stage 2.”

More from Perspective

Get a free copy of our print edition


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Your email address will not be published. The views expressed in the comments below are not those of Perspective. We encourage healthy debate, but racist, misogynistic, homophobic and other types of hateful comments will not be published.